Roundup / Glyphosate Cancer Litigation

Holding Manufacturers Accountable for Cancer-Causing Weed Killers

Titan Legal LLC represents individuals and families who developed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and related cancers after exposure to Roundup and other glyphosate-based herbicides. For decades, agricultural workers, landscapers, and homeowners trusted Roundup as a safe and effective product — yet mounting evidence and court verdicts have revealed that its manufacturer, Monsanto (now owned by Bayer), failed to warn the public of its serious cancer risks.

Practice Areas: Toxic Torts | Product Liability | Agricultural Law | Personal Injury | Wrongful Death

Who May Have a Claim

You may be eligible for compensation if you:

Regularly used Roundup or other glyphosate-based products in your occupation (farming, landscaping, groundskeeping, etc.)
Experienced repeated home or property use over several years
Were diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or related cancers after exposure
Have medical or employment records linking you to glyphosate exposure

Important Note:

Family members of deceased victims may also pursue wrongful death claims.

What Is Roundup and Why Is It Dangerous?

Roundup, first introduced in the 1970s, is one of the world's most widely used herbicides. Its active ingredient, glyphosate, has been identified by the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a "probable human carcinogen."

How Exposure Occurs

Exposure can occur through:

Direct Application

Mixing, spraying, or applying Roundup on farms or lawns

Inhalation

Inhaling airborne particles during use

Contact & Ingestion

Skin contact or ingestion of residue on produce or soil

Associated Cancers

Studies show a strong association between long-term glyphosate exposure and:

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Primary cancer linked to glyphosate exposure in numerous studies and court cases

Multiple Myeloma

Blood cancer affecting plasma cells

Leukemia

Cancer of blood-forming tissues

Other Immune Cancers

Various immune-system related cancers

Evidence & Litigation History

Thousands of victims have already filed claims in state and federal courts across the U.S., with juries awarding billions of dollars in verdicts against Monsanto for failing to warn of Roundup's dangers.

Despite these verdicts, the product remained on the market for years before recent phase-outs began — meaning new victims continue to emerge.

Federal Multidistrict Litigation

Titan Legal LLC helps clients navigate both federal multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 2741) and individual state court claims, ensuring each case receives the attention and evidence development it deserves.

Our Legal Strategy

Titan Legal's attorneys work with nationally recognized toxicology, oncology, and agricultural experts to:

Document the client's history of glyphosate exposure — establishing timeline and frequency of use
Analyze medical and occupational records — connecting exposure to diagnosis
Coordinate expert witness reports — on causation and corporate knowledge
Pursue maximum recovery — for medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and punitive damages against negligent manufacturers

We combine scientific rigor with compassionate advocacy for every client.

No Fees Unless We Win

Titan Legal LLC operates exclusively on a contingency-fee basis — you pay no legal fees unless we secure compensation for you. Our firm advances all litigation costs and only collects if we win.

Viable Legal Theories & Claims

Product Liability - Design Defect

Roundup unreasonably dangerous for intended use

Safer alternative herbicides available

Cancer risks outweigh benefits

Failure to Warn

Inadequate warnings about cancer risk

Failed to disclose known carcinogenic properties

Insufficient safety instructions

Negligence

Monsanto/Bayer knew of cancer link

Failed to conduct adequate safety testing

Breached duty to warn users

Fraudulent Concealment

Company possessed evidence of cancer risks

Actively concealed dangers from public

Manipulated scientific studies

Strict Liability

Product defective and unreasonably dangerous

Defect caused plaintiff's cancer

No need to prove negligence

Punitive Damages

Willful disregard for consumer safety

Conscious indifference to known risks

Decades of concealment for profit

Evidence Collection & Preservation

Critical Evidence Categories

Exposure Documentation

Obtain and Preserve:

Employment records showing herbicide application dutiesLandscaping or groundskeeping work historyAgricultural records and farm logsPurchase receipts for Roundup productsPhotos showing Roundup use or storageWitness statements from co-workers or familyTimeline of exposure frequency and duration

Medical Evidence

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma diagnosis and date
Oncology records and pathology reports
Treatment history (chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy)
Biopsy results and staging information
Progression notes and response to treatment
Differential diagnosis ruling out other causes

Critical Practice Tip:

Establish a clear timeline showing substantial Roundup exposure preceded cancer diagnosis by at least 1-2 years. Expert testimony from oncologists and toxicologists is essential. Cases with decades of occupational exposure have strongest causation evidence.

Discovery Targets Against Monsanto/Bayer

Internal Studies: Company research on glyphosate carcinogenicity
IARC Response: Company's reaction to WHO classification as "probable carcinogen"
Ghostwriting Allegations: Evidence of ghostwritten scientific papers
Regulatory Communications: EPA correspondence and safety submissions
Warning History: Evolution of product labels over time
Marketing Materials: Safety claims made to consumers
Prior Verdicts: Use of previous jury findings and court documents

Damages Framework

Economic Damages

Medical Expenses: Chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy, surgery, hospital stays
Future Medical Care: Ongoing monitoring, maintenance therapy, potential recurrence treatment
Lost Wages: Time off for treatment and recovery
Lost Earning Capacity: Inability to return to physical labor or prior occupation
Caregiver Costs: In-home assistance during treatment

Non-Economic Damages

Pain and Suffering: Physical pain from cancer and treatment side effects
Emotional Distress: Anxiety, depression, fear of recurrence or death
Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Inability to work outdoors, engage in hobbies, physical activities
Loss of Consortium: Impact on spouse and family
Disfigurement: Hair loss, surgical scars, physical changes from treatment

Punitive Damages

Available when Monsanto/Bayer demonstrated:

Knowledge of cancer risks dating back decades
Deliberate concealment and manipulation of science
Continued marketing as safe despite evidence
Prioritizing profits over consumer safety
Pattern of fraudulent conduct established in prior trials

Billion-Dollar Verdicts

Previous juries have awarded substantial verdicts including punitive damages in the hundreds of millions and billions. While each case is evaluated individually, strong evidence of corporate misconduct supports punitive damage claims.

Client Intake & Case Evaluation

Initial Screening Questions

Occupation and work history? (Farmer, landscaper, groundskeeper, nursery worker)
Years and frequency of Roundup use? (Daily, weekly, seasonal)
Type of Roundup products used? (Concentrate, ready-to-use, professional formulations)
Cancer diagnosis and date? (Must be non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or qualifying cancer)
Who diagnosed? (Oncologist, pathology confirmation)
Exposure timeframe vs. diagnosis? (Must establish exposure preceded diagnosis)
Current treatment status? (Active treatment, remission, progression)
Other potential exposures? (Other pesticides, chemicals, radiation)
Family history of lymphoma? (May affect causation analysis)

Evidence Preservation Instructions

Immediately instruct clients to:

Gather all employment records showing herbicide use
Obtain complete medical records from all treating physicians
Document timeline of Roundup use and cancer diagnosis
Preserve receipts, product containers, or photographs
Identify witnesses to product use (co-workers, family, neighbors)
Collect agricultural records or landscaping contracts
Maintain treatment logs and medication records

Strong Case Indicators:

Substantial occupational exposure to Roundup for multiple years
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma diagnosis confirmed by pathology
Clear timeline: exposure preceded diagnosis
Employment or purchase records confirming glyphosate use
No strong alternative causation (limited other pesticide exposure)
Documented frequency and duration of use
Within applicable statute of limitations

MDL Coordination

Roundup cases coordinated in MDL No. 2741 (N.D. California - previously active, now largely resolved through settlements):

Settlement Programs: Bayer has established settlement funds for qualifying cases
State Court Options: Some cases may proceed in state courts for strategic reasons
New Cases: Recent diagnoses continue to emerge as product was sold for years
Individual Assessment: Each case evaluated for settlement eligibility or trial potential

Contact Titan Legal LLC

If you or a loved one were diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or another cancer after using Roundup, contact Titan Legal LLC today for a free and confidential case evaluation.

•Client Referrals: Connect qualified Roundup clients with experienced litigation attorneys
•Co-Counsel Arrangements: Partner on toxic tort and product liability cases
•Settlement Evaluation: Assess eligibility for Bayer settlement programs
•Expert Witness Resources: Oncologists, toxicologists, epidemiologists
•Trial Experience: Access to attorneys with Roundup trial experience

Submit Case Referral Call: 1-866-286-7286

All consultations are strictly confidential and without obligation. No fees unless we win your case.

Disclaimer: Attorney Advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. All cases are reviewed individually. Titan Legal LLC is not affiliated with Monsanto, Bayer, or any governmental agency. Consultations are confidential and without obligation.